Compare between Satkaryavada and Asatkaryavada.
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Satkaryavada and Asatkaryavada are two philosophical perspectives within Indian philosophy, particularly in the context of the philosophy of causation.
Satkaryavada:
Satkaryavada asserts that the effect preexists in some form in the cause. It posits that the effect is already present in a potential or unmanifest state within the cause before its actual manifestation. This viewpoint is often associated with the Vedantic school of thought and is exemplified in the idea that the entire universe potentially exists in an unmanifest form within Brahman.
Asatkaryavada:
Asatkaryavada, on the other hand, maintains that the effect is entirely non-existent in the cause before its manifestation. According to this perspective, the effect is a new creation and comes into being at the moment of its manifestation. This viewpoint is often associated with the Nyaya-Vaisesika and Mimamsa schools of philosophy.
In essence, the key distinction lies in the relationship between cause and effect. While Satkaryavada posits a preexistence of the effect in the cause, Asatkaryavada asserts that the effect is entirely non-existent in the cause and comes into being only when the causal conditions are fulfilled.